 |
                

 
|
|
On a roll ! - One more week!
by Fanny Zuniga
February 19, 1998
We are settling into a routine here, and making great
progress on our test. We made our 400th run late this week. Things have
really calmed down, so I'll just give you some highlights of the week.
Our day team and night team are competing to see who makes more runs in
the tunnel. The crews are also competing to see who can make the quickest
model changes. It's like we are having some Wind Tunnel Olympics going
on here!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel. The
end of the test means we all get a much needed rest. Meanwhile, it seems
that now we could keep the model for an extra week if we need it. And,
the next test to use this tunnel can give us a few extra days if we really
need it. But, by the end of the week we caught up with our planned run
schedule so we may not need extra time back after all. So, everyone is
asking "When will this test end?" We are feeling a bit less pressure and
are confident that we'll complete almost everything we had planned.
This also means we should get to do some of the interesting
stuff we planned for the end (stuff we'd skip if we hadn't caught up).
For example, on Thursday, we decided we could set up the model deformation
system I described a few weeks ago. So we removed the mini tufts from
some of the left hand wing, painted the the wing black to cut down glare,
then applied reflective targets over that. By Friday we took some practice
images to checkout the video imaging system that we will use next week
to calculate how our wing bends and twists under high loads. As another
example, if we keep making this great progress we should have time to
use the Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP) I talked about. So we are refining
our preliminary plans for using PSP and really working out the details
of when to paint, when to install cameras, and when to make the runs.
And we still hope to just squeeze in the oil flow studies after the PSP
runs.
We have also been able to do some of the things that
we really wanted to do but that weren't the highest priority. We were
able to study the effects of the model "skidding". This helps make sure
the airplane will be controllable in flight. For this, instead of just
tilting the model's nose up and down (angle of attack), we also swung
the model's nose to the left and right. We also stuck some model wheels
on to see how they effect the aerodynamic forces during takeoff and landing.
We also got to test how effective the horizontal tail is. The tail is
the primary way that the pilot controls the speed of the airplane, so
we tilted the tail up and down for a bunch of runs to make sure it could
control the airplane.
We have had the usual list of small problems. For
example, we use wax to fill in holes where screws hold the flaps on the
wing. We had some trouble keeping the wax from blowing off the model.
We also had a small piece of the model come off during one of the runs.
A big piece flying down the tunnel is a test team's worst nightmare because
it can damage the tunnel. Since it was a small aluminum part, it wasn't
a big deal. A bigger piece, or harder metal, might have damaged the giant
fan that pushes the air around. Finally, remember those accelerometers
we use to measure the model's angle of attack (a very important thing
to know)? Also remember I said we double up on instruments when we can?
Good thing we did! The main one we were using quit working properly, but
we were able to keep on testing using the backup.
When everything is working well, here is a typical
sequence of activities: We look at our run schedule and decided what we
want to run next. Usually we follow our original run schedule, but we
can make changes based on what we've learned about the airplane. If we
are running behind, we can skip over something that is less important.
Next, we tell the shift engineer what we want to do. He/she opens up the
wind tunnel and the mechanics change the model to the next configuration.
When the tunnel is finally closed up, several different conditions (like
airspeed) are run. For each run we tilt the model through several angles
of attack. As soon as signals start coming in, technicians process the
data and send it to us to look at. We plot it up on our computers, check
to make sure it looks OK, and use the information to answer our research
questions and to help us plan the next set of runs.
We do the things that are fastest the most often,
like change angle of attack (the tunnel controllers do this in 2 seconds).
The things that take a long time, mainly changing the model configuration,
we try to do less often. An example - - our Olympic Tail Changing Team
can take the tail off in 5 minutes once the tunnel is stopped and the
test section is open. Changing flap angles, however, means taking out
a lot of screws, changing the flap angle, and putting all the screws back
in - maybe one and a half hours. We generally try to sequence our list
of runs in this order: for each type of flap we go through all the flap
angles. For each flap angle we run with the tail on and off. For each
of these configurations we get data for all the angles of attack and airspeeds
we want. Finally we put on a new flap type and repeat the whole sequence.
Once we make a model change, we want to get all the data on that configuration.
We don't want to have to change the model back to the same configuration
later just to get one more piece of information. That's why we spend so
much time in the beginning of the test making sure everything is working
properly. Once we move on, we want to be confident that we won't have
to back up. One exception to this pattern is flow visualization studies
which we save until the end of the test because they take so much time.
Sometimes this means we have to go back to a configuration we tested earlier.
1 |
Here is one of the two tunnel operators. He stops and
starts the tunnel and sets the tunnel speed. The other operator is in
charge of the model position. Their work stations are all computerized.
No levers and dials like you see in old movies! |
| This figures shows our progress over the last 4 weeks.
We planned to install the model Jan 20 and make our first runs Jan
23. The red curve shows that plan, which flattens out for each weekend.
You can see how we started late and fell behind even more. We weren't
too happy that first week of February. We finally caught up this week
so we can probably get to all the neat stuff we planned for the end
of the test. Yeah! |
2 |
3 |
These are the main landing gear wheels. The model
has two sets of main gear and one nose gear. |
| Here is a picture of the reflective targets on the
wing and body that are used to study wing bending and twisting. The
targets reflected my camera flash the same way they will reflect a
spot light which is next to the video camera that will capture images
just like this one. By comparing images of the wing with and without
the tunnel running, we can calculate how the wing deforms. |
4  |
|
|