Meet: Mary Anne Frey
Neurolab Program Scientist
What I do
I'm a program scientist or program coordinator for several programs.
Neurolab is one of the most important. Other important programs I'm involved
in include development of the Human Research Facility that will be on
the Space Station and a program for ground-based research in space physiology.
This program seeks to develop countermeasures to some of the effects of
space flight for astronauts in flight and coming back to Earth, such as
the loss of bone or the tendency to faint. I also work with scientists
at universities, people at other agencies such as the National Institutes
of Health and the National Science Foundation, and our international partners
in space life sciences to coordinate joint programs.
Role for Neurolab
For Neurolab, my title is program scientist. I am the chief scientist
at NASA Headquarters for the Neurolab Program. One of my responsibilities
is to be sure that innovative, state-of-the-art science is performed on
Neurolab and also to communicate the exciting research that we're doing
on Neurolab. I work with our partners, the NASA centers, and the investigators.
Sometimes I'm responsible for resolving conflicts.
We want to be sure that all of the science that we support is high quality
science. Typically this is done by getting together a panel of experts
in the scientific discipline and having them read the proposals that the
scientists submit. The experts review these proposals and evaluate them.
This is what we call "peer review" of the science proposals.
The STS-90 experiment selection was a very special one. It was managed
by the National Institutes of Health because they have so much expertise
in peer review, and they are partners in Neurolab. Neurolab is an international
partnership and includes science that is funded by all the participating
agencies. So the peer review was international: it was something that
hadn't been done before.
For all research we fund, we depend heavily upon scientists to evaluate
the proposals for us. Then, after they've evaluated the scientific merit,
if the proposal is for a flight experiment, it is examined to be sure
that it can be done in flight. That review is performed by people who
are experts in flight hardware: people who work at our Centers. In the
case of the life sciences, that means the Johnson Space Center and the
Ames Research Center.
Then we, at headquarters, (and, in the case of Neurolab, with our partners)
decide what fits together to make a good compatible space flight mission.
On Neurolab the investigations were put together in teams in which they
were either sharing the subjects, or had the same research goals, or were
using the same hardware. That, again, is special to Neurolab.
My Career Journey
Ever since the space program started, I've been excited about it, but
at first I didn't imagine I'd be a part of it. I really wasn't interested
in science until I took an astronomy course when I started college, and
this course was so exciting that I knew I wanted to learn much more about
the secrets of the universe and the world and life. A teacher turned me
on to science.
Even though I had been totally avoiding science before the astronomy
course, after this course, I decided to major in physics. Then I went
on to study physiology when I was in graduate school. When I finished
graduate school, I taught physiology in a medical school for a number
of years and did research studying cardiovascular physiology and exercise.
Then in 1982, I joined the space program.
When I started working with NASA, I was a researcher. I worked first
at the Kennedy Space Center, and then at the Johnson Space Center. I was
doing research related to what we call "orthostatic intolerance." When
astronauts come back to Earth after they become adapted to space and weightlessness,
they tend to faint when they stand because their blood pressure falls.
This is "orthosstatic intolerance." I was doing research and looking for
countermeasures that we might use to protect astronauts when they return
to Earth's gravity.
I think that experience as a scientific researcher is essential for
my current job. I guess it would be possible, but not as good, to try
to do the management type job I do now if I hadn't been a researcher.
Another important experience was having worked at some of the NASA centers.
I interact with the centers a lot now, and I have a much better appreciation
for what the people at the centers do because I worked there before I
came to headquarters. It helps in the communication.
When I was at the Kennedy Space Center and going into management, I
went back to school, and obtained an MBA in management. That's also been
helpful in doing my present job. There are many different pathways by
which a person could come to this job. I don't know that any one is perfect,
but I think that my background has worked very well for many of the things
that I'm doing now.
Likes/Dislikes about career
I guess you can imagine: it's a very exciting job! I love it, and Neurolab
is a wonderful mission. There's so much state-or-the-art, innovative science
on Neurolab that I think it will be the most exciting space life sciences
mission ever flown. And also, of course, working with the Human Research
Facility on the International Space Station. That's the science platform
of the future.
I work with excellent scientists from all over the world. This is exciting!
I work with the astronauts and people at the centers who have experience
with space life sciences missions. The people I work with at headquarters
are good to work with and they work very hard.
I travel throughout the United States and overseas. I've just returned
from a trip where I met with our partners from the European Space Agency,
the Japanese Space Agency, the Canadian Space Agency, Germany, France
and Italy. And this is certainly a fun part of the job.
I do have to work hard and work long hours. That's not just me: that's
a lot of the people in this business. Sometimes I miss being the researcher
who's actually doing the exciting research. So before somebody gets into
a job like this, they should be sure that they want a break from research
or have finished their research career. I don't regret my decision at
all, but I do miss being a researcher.
One of the negatives of the job is the uncertainty of the budget from
year to year. We have to wait for Congress to give us a budget and for
the budget to be worked out in the Agency. We're not always certain from
year to year what our budgets will be. That makes it difficult to plan
for the future. That's not just my problem: it's everybody's problem in
the government who is trying to plan for the future.
Preparation for career
As a child I never thought about this kind of a job. When I was a child
there wasn't a space program. It was before Sputnik, the first flight
of the USSR, the first flight of Alan Shephard and John Glenn. I listened
to Buck Rogers on the radio; space flight was very exciting, but the idea
that it would happen in my lifetime was something that I didn't think
about then. I make it sound like I'm really old, but it's amazing that
science and engineering have made such strides. Also it would have been
unlikely at that time that a woman would have been considered for this
job, or that girls were thinking about these kinds of jobs. This is a
wonderful change over the years, and I'm delighted that we now have access
to these exciting jobs.
I did like to read. I was a good student especially in math, although
as I said I wasn't interested in science. I was interested in sports and
exercise. Space flight is not exactly sports and exercise, but it's an
integrated activity of the human body like exercise. When we're thinking
about space flight we're really thinking about what happens in the whole
body. And when we talk about exercise we're looking at what happens in
the whole body, so there is a relationship.
In addition, I never liked to be told I couldn't do something! So the
challenge of space flight and of having a job like this, while I can't
say it's something I prepared for as a child, maybe it suited my personality.
Advice
My advice is not to limit your horizons. I believe a good well-rounded
education is very important. Certainly for this job science is important,
but so are communications skills; and writing skills are very, very important
for being a scientist, for being a manager, and for working at NASA. Knowledge
about business and management helps when you're working on the management
side. I tremendously admire my colleagues who can speak one or two or
more languages when we go overseas. This is not a skill I have but certainly
one that I would recommend to students planning to go into this type of
profession where we interact so much on an international level.
Another thing is: get varied experience before going for a job like
mine at headquarters. Work and visit centers, universities, medical centers
and try to have some overseas experience and have experience generally
in the field before getting into the management-type job.
Influences
Of course, many people are influencial for all of us in choosing our
careers. I especially remember my astronomy teacher from college. Although
I haven't seen him since or heard from him, his good teaching was so influential
in changing me from a science phobic to a real science enthusiast.
My family has been supportive. I was married and had children when I
was very young - before I had any college experience. I actually started
college when my children were in school: getting ready for junior high
school actually. With their encouragement, which was very important, I
kept going until I finished a Ph.D., so you know that was a lot of years!
They were off in college by the time I finished.
Personal Information
I have three daughters. One of them lives in Colorado, one in Virginia,
and one in Ohio. I have four granddaughters and one grandson. Chester
is a beautiful two-year old longhaired yellow cat who lives with me. Chester
is very smart!
I like to read and to play tennis and golf. I don't think you'll be
reading about me at the U.S.Open or anything, but I love to play tennis.
|