FIELD JOURNAL FIELD JOURNAL FIELD JOURNAL FIELD JOURNAL
E-132 Experiment Hardware Testing in the Spacelab Module
by Brad Berch
December 12, l997
Today is Friday, December 12th, and the last day of planned experiment
testing in the O&C [operations and checkout] Building (at Kennedy Space
Center) and prior to Christmas. After the first of the year [1998] the
Spacelab Module will be moved to the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF)
where it will be installed into the Space Shuttle Columbia.
Two weeks of experiment hardware testing have gone well, but the team,
including myself, will be glad to finish today's testing and get a full
night's rest. Most of our test days have started at 0700 [7:00 a.m.] and
have finished anywhere from 7 p.m. to 2 a.m. Maybe, I will finally get
some Christmas shopping done this weekend prior to my return trip home
next week. . .
Our primary objective today is to get access to the Spacelab and to find
locations inside the Spacelab where rodents, which will be part of the
E-132 experiment, can be subjected to light pulses of specified intensity
during inflight operations. Light intensity and quality are important
aspects of Dr. Fuller's E-132 experiment that is looking at the effects
of spaceflight on circadian rhythms and homeostasis. [part of the Neuronal Plasticity Team.]
The time allowed to us in the Spacelab Module was limited by the KSC Level
III/II team, who agreed to do this on a non-interference basis and only
after much discussion and negotiation. . . Spacelab locations that were
evaluated for this light pulse operation were generally away from the
LBNP [Lower Body Negative Pressure] and VFEU [Vestibular Function Experiment
Units] activities which were ongoing during our test opportunity.
The entire test was photo documented (by Stefan Rosner) using the digital
camera and should allow the project and Dr. Fuller to select an appropriate
location for the light pulse flight activity.
The equipment used for the light intensity measurements and spectral analysis
was provided and operated by Neil Yorio of the Dynamac Corporation located
at Hangar L. These folks are experts in the analysis of light as part
of the Plant Space Biology and Advanced Life Support Projects.
The equipment provided by Neil included a Quantum Sensor for photon-to-lux
measurement and a Spectroradiometer for spectral analysis. A data sheet
was used to record photon/lux measurements, while data from the Spectroradiometer
will be downloaded and provide to us in the near future.
The following Spacelab locations were evaluated and found to provide
light intensity levels acceptable (275-325 lux) for the E-132 experiment
as described in the test requirements.
| Spacelab Location |
Location |
Light Intensity |
| Locker R10B |
2 inches from locker top |
4.2 photons or 311 Lux |
| Locker R9B |
1 inch from locker top |
4.0 photons or 298 Lux |
| Locker L10B |
2 inches from locker top |
3.8 photons or 281 Lux |
Placement of the GPTU for the locations listed above included centering
the GPTU under the Spacelab Light, to the extent possible, given that
the Spacelab handrails prevented complete centering.
Spacelab locations that did not appear acceptable, and that were tested,
included L8B and all overhead locker locations. Locker L8B is not desirable
due to possible interference of GPTU sock and the adjacent LSLE refrigerator
freezer fan operation. All overhead locker locations have light obstructions
that would yield lux values slightly above 100 lux.
It is important to note that other Spacelab Locker locations may be
acceptable beyond those listed above. If the described locations are found
to be not suitable due to operational or other constraints, then addtional
testing would need to occur in the spacelab at a later date (in the OPF).
For planning purposes, if this test is repeated, two to four hours should
be allotted with three personnel supporting the test and in the Spacelab
Module.
One G handling constraints made it difficult to maintain the Animal Holding
Box above the Rodent RAHF Cage. Note: this problem may not be isolated
to 1G as much room in the GPTU sock allows for the Animal Holding Box
to slide to the side of the RAHF Cage.
Measurements were taken with and without the RAHF cage underneath the
Animal Holding Box with no appreciable difference in light readings between
the two test configurations. Light measurements given above were performed
with the Animal Holding Box configured within the GPTU and Quantum Sensor
Probe configured at 90 degrees away from the GPTU door. The Animal Holding
Box was maintained during measurements in close proximity to the GPTU
door as would be the case in the Zero G configuration.
Well, as you might be thinking, a picture here will be worth a thousand
words. I would estimate that the digital photos and spectral analysis
will be available by week's end.
To perform this test I wanted to point out that I had great support from
Stefan (as usual) who photo documented and also participated in the test
and Neil Yorio who dropped everything he was doing to meet the very narrow
window of opportunity that KSC Level III/II management team provided to
us. Neil and I played on the same softball team a few years ago when I
worked at KSC on the Life Sciences Support Contract. It sure helps to
stay in touch with old friends and colleagues! Thanks again Neil!
|